The atmosphere is definitely quite heavy around Real Madrid. Now assured of a second season without a major trophy, the Spanish club must also deal with several controversies, several of which concern Kylian Mbappé. While some supporters openly demand his departure, and local media explain that the atmosphere is not the warmest in the locker room, the striker posted a message during Real’s defeat against Barça this Sunday (2-0). And a new controversy immediately arose.
However, Kylian Mbappé encouraged his team. “Come on Madrid”he posted on his social networks during this last Clasico of the season. But for some, the choice of this message was not wise. Columnist for the L’Équipe channel, Séverine Parlakou expressed her annoyance this Monday, when discussing the communication from the captain of the France team. “It is he who lets us interpret (his message) quite simply. No, for me he is totally provocative. »
And the one who also appears on Sunday in the Téléfoot show, to decide on the Real Madrid-Kylian Mbappé marriage.
“I’m sorry, but for me it’s already a fiasco. It happens, there is not a single major trophy. He has main character syndrome (…). Obviously it’s his fault. Honestly, you don’t need to make this story 2-0. You are down 2-0, you have the title at stake, you are facing your historic rival, and you are there quietly on your sofa posting a story at 2-0? »
Kylian Mbappé, a communication that questions
An outspoken supporter of Real Madrid, Séverine Parlakou continued. “For me it’s total provocation. And still today (Monday)he posts a little story, all smiles, calm, leaving the gym. You’re supposedly the leader, you’re the most important player, your team just lost the title, and you’re still posting this kind of story? Sorry, but his communication is terrible. For me, it’s on the same level as ‘pivot gang’. We are exactly there. »
For the observer, Kylian Mbappé would therefore do what was necessary to maintain a certain ambiguity. “It leaves a little room for doubt, for overinterpretation. It’s because of him that we’re having these kinds of debates, because he’s the one who lets us imagine so many things. (…) Maybe we have a lot of imagination, but it’s because of him. »