Bernard Caïazzo has it bad. Four days after the broadcast of the “Investigation supplement” number on Nasser Al-Khelaïfi, the former Saint-Etienne leader went up to the niche to condemn the ways of doing “complement of investigation”, the last issue broadcast this Thursday was devoted to Nasser Al-Khelaïfi.
The former co-president of the Stéphanois club notably regretted the non-discretion of an interview which he had granted complementary investigation last November and pointed out the impartiality of the France 2 program.
“I had given a frank interview on what I thought of Nasser and then I am announced two days before my passage will not be kept”he blown, adding: “I don't know the reasons. I said it was a lack of respect and that I found it incorrect. I just think it was a programs thoroughly. »»
“As if Nasser was going to take care of that”
“Honestly, they (the show) do not know football. Nine months of investigation, I do not know if the journalist worked in football … “he added, before defending the president of PSG, especially in the affair of the banners deployed in the stands of the Parc des Princes on the occasion of the last PSG-OM and the return of Adrien Rabiot.
“Explain to us that a club president can influence the supporters according to the banners they put … it's a joke. They do not realize, he deplored.
If you have a Marseillais, trained in Marseille who leaves free and signs at PSG, he thinks that the supporters will not put banners to insult his mother, his father, his grandfather? It's unfortunate, huh, but Nasser Al-Khelaïfi does not have a control on it. And especially as if Nasser was going to take care of that. They do not understand that Nasser, for example, he also has a role of president of the ECA. He chats with Infantino, he will not get bored with stories of stands. »»
