The psychiatric expert report sent to the courts in the context of the Hamraoui affair highlights Aminata Diallo’s “personality disorders”.
At the wheel of the vehicle which brought Kheira Hamraoui back on November 4, 2021 and present at the time of the attack with an iron bar on her former Paris Saint-Germain teammate by two individuals, Aminato Diallo was quickly heard for the first time before be released without charge against him. But a few months later (fall 2022), the midfielder was placed in police custody again, this time indicted for “ aggravated violence ” And ” conspiracy“. She was heard by a psychiatrist whose report’s conclusions were revealed.
In its columns, the Sunday Newspaper brought to light the famous seventy-six page documents. A report which highlights different traits of Aminata Diallo’s personality. During three interviews lasting a total of nine hours and thirty minutes, Doctor Isabelle Teillet was able to get an idea of ​​her interlocutor and in her report, she affirmed that “ the person concerned presents (…) undeniable personality disorders with patent narcissistic flaws, identity disturbances and at least indeterminacy in her sexual orientation (…)“.
Threats to the cutter
The psychiatrist, however, noted that Aminata Diallo “ does not show any particular psycho-pathological trait (…), no psychotic manifestation, no thought disorder (…) and no delusional or hallucinatory disorder“. Two incidents were also mentioned by the former PSG herself. The first when she was fourteen, when she arrived at the boarding school at Olympique Lyonnais, with a threat with a box cutter towards a 3rd grade student whom she described as “ little bicker » during the interview. The second during a knife attack on his older sister. “ A little bit of nothing » to the abdomen, the twenty-eight-year-old young woman told the psychiatrist.
This entire report was therefore sent to the Versailles investigating judge in charge of the case. Aminata Diallo and her lawyers have a period of fifteen days to request a second opinion or provide additional information, from receipt of the document by the courts.
