The Higher Sports Council (CSD) decided in favor of FC Barcelona in the Dani Olmo and Pau Víctor licenses file, believing that the RFEF-Liga commission did not have jurisdiction to judge the validity of the economic control applied by the Liga. This decision, formalized in a 34 -page document, confirms the position of Barça, which therefore retains its two players. Sport Affirm that La Liga, for its part, firmly disputed the resolution by calling it ” non -conforming to law And announced that she would bring the case to ordinary justice. Despite this, the other clubs, including those most critical during the first provisional measure in January, remained silent. Atlético de Madrid, for example, did not publish a press release this time, despite its declarations from the start of the year claiming that the initial CSD decision ” endangered the current system ».
The Real Federación Española de Fútbol (RFEF) did not take a stand either. Its president, Rafael Louzán, was in Belgrade for his election to the executive committee of UEFA, and did not publicly react to the decision of the CSD or to the intentions of Laliga. Contacted by the press, the RFEF communication team has not confirmed whether an official declaration would be made soon. This absence of a collective reaction leaves a certain vagueness hovering, while the tension rises between institutions and the resolution of the CSD could create a legal precedent.