It’s been almost 3 years since Thibaud Vézirian insisted that OM was in the process of selling. However, no change is visible and Frank McCourt is still the boss. Mocked by some, the journalist defends his theory at all costs and explains.
We cannot blame Thibaud Vézirian for being inconsistent in his analyses. The journalist, formerly of La Chaine L’Equipe, remains entrenched in his positions: OM has been sold in part by Frank McCourt. For almost 3 years, he has been defending this theory, indicating that Frank McCourt did not want to assume the responsibilities of the Marseille club alone. In reality, however, nothing seems to have changed in OM’s organization chart. A reality that provokes mockery and attacks against Thibaud Vézirian on social networks. Exasperated by these messages, the latter communicated an open letter ” Letter to the impatient in his program Le Déj Foot on Youtube.
Vézirian pleads good faith in his work
If his position concerning OM has evolved, we have gone from an official sale to a merger-acquisition process according to him, he maintains that Frank McCourt has let go of ballast at OM. He highlights the interesting lifestyle of the club in recent years, impossible to maintain for McCourt alone according to him, to illustrate his theory. While some are calling for much more concrete evidence, Thibaud Vézirian explains that this is difficult. He relies on the protection of the journalist’s sources and specifies that his contacts at OM cannot say more. However, this does not call into question the veracity of his information according to him.
#Video – Vézirian releases his truths on the #SaleOM in an open letter.https://t.co/qWh3O70Fkq#TeamOM | #Marseille | #MercatOM | #League 1 | @ThibaudVezirian
— TeamFootball (@TeamFootballFr) June 27, 2023
” Proofs and sources, I had some, I have some. Info, I gave some, not all, with transparency and honesty. Unfortunately, some judge without knowing, it is the favorite sport of our society. Especially when you’re hidden behind your phone screen. (…) Unfortunately, no, I say it again to those who have never stopped asking for it: My evidence involves trusted people, families, work, trust… So they will be protected at all costs. It’s the profession that wants it. As for the sources, they are also protected, that’s for sure. Even if I often gave their sectors of activity. A dozen sources at the beginning, dozens and dozens today “, he dropped, annoyed, in his last video. These informants will still have to let go of more concrete things under penalty of seeing this soap opera die out quickly despite the will of Thibaud Vézirian.
